Logo

If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

10.06.2025 00:13

If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

Nazis.

Are you going to stay on a social media site that’s all photos of babies being raped, Nazis posting graphic descriptions of finishing what Hitler started, and plans for school shootings?

If I let you borrow my bike for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to take it back. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

Procter & Gamble to cut 7,000 jobs as part of broader restructuring - CNBC

I hate censorship. That is, I think the government has no place controlling what people say, read, express, or create, except insofar as is necessary to prevent things like terroristic threats, dissemination of classified information, fraud, false advertising, and so on.

Why do “censorship-free” social media networks always fail? Well, let’s see. Sit down and think. Think really, really hard.

The #3 user? Terrorists. 8kun was used to plan 3 different school shootings in a 6-month period.

Dad Assumed Tingling in His Hands Was Just Pins and Needles. Days Later, He Was Paralyzed: ‘Had to Sleep with My Eyes Open’ - AOL.com

Child pornographers.

Now, say you’re an ordinary person. You don’t like child porn. You’re not a Nazi. You don’t want to shoot up a school or blow up the White House.

Who is the #1 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who most wants that?

Why do people say African Americans act the way they do because they're poor, when the ones with money act the same?

Because you’re confusing two different things.

The #1 problem people who make and consume child pornography have is connecting the producers with the buyers. Any “censorship-free” network quickly gets overrun with child porn. Classic example: 8kun.

So.

Why are black people seen as scary or a threat to some people?

That has nothing to do with social media.

If i let you use my computer network for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to kick you off. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

We don’t have to guess. We know.

More measles exposures are happening at airports and tourist destinations. Here’s what travelers need to know - CNN

You have the right to say what you want. You do not have the right to use other people’s stuff for free.

“Censorship-free” social media sites quickly become Nazi bars where people exchange child porn. Normal human beings don’t hang out in Nazi bars with pedophiles.

Who is the #2 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who else wants that?

How corporate America learnt not to mess with Texas - Financial Times